China Cuba Laos North Korea Vietnam Elected Communist Parties by Country

Cyprus Nepal Historical Communist States

Afghanistan Albania Angola Benin Bulgaria Congo-Brazzaville Czechoslovakia East Germany Hungary Ethiopia

Grenada Kampuchea Mongolia Mozambique North Vietnam Poland Romania Somalia South Yemen Soviet Union Yugoslavia Communism v d e Part of the Politics series Forms of government List of government types Anarchy Aristocracy Authoritarianism Totalitarianism Confederation Communist state Demarchy Democracy Direct democracy Representative democracy Despotism Autocracy Dictatorship Military dictatorship Military junta Empire Fascist state Federation Feudalism Gerontocracy Green state Interregnum Caretaker government Interrex Provisional government Transitional government Kleptocracy Matriarchy Meritocracy Minarchism Monarchy Enlightened absolutism Absolute monarchy Constitutional monarchy Elective monarchy Hereditary monarchy Regency Nation-state Oligarchy Parliamentary Patriarchy Plutocracy Police state Polyarchy Presidential Puppet state Republic Socialist state Collective leadership Soviet Republic Supranational union Synarchy Technocracy Thalassocracy Theocracy Theodemocracy Timocracy Tribal Chiefdom Tyranny Unitary state Welfare state Politics portal v d e

A communist state is a state with a form of government characterized by single-party rule or dominant-party rule of a communist party and a professed allegiance to a communist ideology as the guiding principle of the state.

Communist states may have several legal political parties but the communist party is usually granted a special or dominant role in government1 often by statute or under the constitution. Consequently the institutions of the state and of the communist party become intimately entwined such as in the development of parallel institutions.

In the 20th century most communist states adopted planned economies. However there were exceptions: The Soviet Union during the 1920s and Yugoslavia after World War II allowed limited markets and a degree of worker self-management while China Vietnam and Laos introduced far-reaching market reforms after the 1980s.

The fundamental concepts of communist states often diverge from the original socio-economic ideologies from which they develop. As a result many adherents of these ideologies often oppose the political systems commonly associated with these states. For example activists describing themselves as Trotskyists or communists were often opposed to the communist states of the 20th century claiming either that they have nothing to do with 'real' communism or that the ideology of such states has reached a point of irrevocable corruption. Contents 1 Types of communist states 2 State institutions 2.1 State social institutions 2.2 Political power 3 Objections to use of term 4 Criticism 4.1 From the moderate liberal viewpoint 4.2 From the communist and socialist viewpoints 5 Modern period 5.1 List of current communist states 5.1.1 Communist states which have adopted widespread market economic reforms 5.1.2 Communist states with no references to Marxist-Leninism but still possess a party-state overlap 5.2 Democratic states with communist governments 5.3 Communist parties as part of other ruling coalition 6 See also 7 References Types of communist states

While historically almost all claim lineage to Marxist thought there are many varieties of communist states with indigenous adaptions. For Marxist-Leninists the state and the communist party claim to act in accordance with the wishes of the industrial working class. For Maoists the state and party claim to act in accordance to the peasantry. Under Deng Xiaoping the People's Republic of China proclaimed a policy of "socialism with Chinese characteristics". In most communist states governments assert that they represent the democratic dictatorship of the proletariat. Alternative names that states adhering to an officially "communist" ideology may assign themselves is socialist state socialist republic or of some type of socialism. This is because in the history of the nations there has never been a real communism as Marxism intended to. State institutions Communist states share similar institutions which are organized on the premise that the communist party is a vanguard of the proletariat and represents the long-term interests of the people. The doctrine of democratic centralism which was developed by Lenin as a set of principles to be used in the internal affairs of the communist party is extended to society at large.2 According to democratic centralism all leaders must be elected by the people and all proposals must be debated openly but once a decision has been reached all people have a duty to obey that decision and all debate should end. When used within a political party democratic centralism is meant to prevent factionalism and splits. When applied to an entire state democratic centralism creates a one-party system.2 The constitutions of most communist states describe their political system as a form of democracy.3 Thus they recognize the sovereignty of the people as embodied in a series of representative parliamentary institutions. Communist states do not have a separation of powers; instead they have one national legislative body (such as the Supreme Soviet in the Soviet Union) which is considered the highest organ of state power and which is legally superior to the executive and judicial branches of government.4 Such national legislative politics in communist states often have a similar structure to the parliaments that exist in liberal republics with two significant differences: first the deputies elected to these national legislative bodies are not expected to represent the interests of any particular constituency but the long-term interests of the people as a whole; second against Marx's advice the legislative bodies of communist states are not in permanent session. Rather they convene once or several times per year in sessions which usually last only a few days.5 When the national legislative body is not in session its powers are transferred to a smaller council (often called a presidium) which combines legislative and executive power and in some communist states (such as the Soviet Union before 1990) acts as a collective head of state. In some systems the presidium is composed of important communist party members who vote the resolutions of the communist party into law. State social institutions Another feature of communist states is the existence of numerous state-sponsored social organizations (trade unions youth organizations women's organizations associations of teachers writers journalists and other professionals consumer cooperatives sports clubs etc.) which are integrated into the political system. In some communist stateswhich representatives of these organizations are guaranteed a certain number of seats on the national legislative bodies. In all communist states the social organizations are expected to promote social unity and cohesion to serve as a link between the government and society and to provide a forum for recruitment of new communist party members.6 Political power Historically the political organization of many communist states has been dominated by a single-party monopoly. Some communist regimes such as North Korea East Germany or the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic have or had more than one political party but all minor parties are or were required to follow the leadership of the communist party. In communist states the government may not tolerate criticism of policies that have already been implemented in the past or are being implemented in the present.7 In addition communist states are widely seen as being de facto dictatorships by historians and sociologists as rigged elections have been commonplace under some communist governments.8 Nevertheless communist parties have won elections and governed in the context of multi-party democracies without seeking to establish a one-party state. Examples include San Marino Republic of Nicaragua 9 Republic of Moldova (since 2001) Cyprus (presently)10 and the Indian states of Kerala West Bengal and Tripura.11 However for the purposes of this article these entities do not fall under the definition of communist state. Objections to use of term Not every country ruled by a communist party is viewed by left communists12 and Trotskyists13 as a communist state and the term "communist state" has traditionally been used in Western political scientists and mass-media to refer to a specific type of one-party state. Some communists such left communists12 dispute the validity of the term "communist state". In classical Marxism communism is the final phase of history at which time the state would have "withered away"14 and therefore "communist state" is a contradiction in terms under premises of this theory. Current states are either in the capitalist or socialist phase of history  making the term "socialist state" preferable to many communists and marxist theorists15. Some socialists like left communists12 oppose the idea of a vanguard party pulling a nation towards communism and thus the term "socialist state" is liable to cause confusion. Others assert that the role of the communist party (i.e. the vanguard party) is to pull a nation toward the communist phase of history. Some Marxists12 have also opposed the usage of the term "communist state". Their critique may be based on a variety of arguments but nearly all anti-Stalinist communists12 argued that the Soviet model did not represent the interests of the working class. As such Trotskyists16 referred to the Soviet Union as a "degenerated workers' state" and called its satellites "deformed workers states".16 Criticism Main article: Criticisms of communist party rule From the moderate liberal viewpoint Totalitarian communist regimes have been criticized for their one-party dictatorships totalitarian control of the economy and society and repression of civil liberties by the Council of Europe17 economic focus on heavy industry at the expense of consumer goods sometimes resulting in shortages of vital products or even famine by Leonard E. Hubbard18 and militarism and propaganda to cover up the mistakes of the government by Peter Kenez.19 From the communist and socialist viewpoints Within the socialist and communist movements themselves there are a number of criticisms of using the term "communist states". Left communists20 Anarchists and some Trotskyists21 point out the fact that the so-called "communist" or "socialist" states or "people's states" were actually state capitalist and thus cannot be called "socialist". Modern period List of current communist states The following countries are one-party states in which the institutions of the ruling communist party and the state have become intertwined; hence they fall under the definition of Communist states. They are listed here together with the year of their founding and their respective ruling parties:22 Democratic People's Republic of Korea (since 1948); Korean Worker's Party (Communism in Korea) People's Republic of China (since 1949); Communist Party of China Socialist Republic of Vietnam (since 1976); Communist Party of Vietnam (ruled the Democratic Republic of Vietnam since 1954) Republic of Cuba (Cuban Revolution in 1959 socialist state declared in 1961); Communist Party of Cuba Lao People's Democratic Republic (since 1975); Lao People's Revolutionary Party However in modern times it is questionable how communist these countries really are.23242526 While these countries share a similar system of government and ideological roots they make use of diverse approaches to economic organization and activity. In addition the various communist states now use different terms to identify themselves and their social systems. The only communist state which still traditionally follows Marxist-Leninist doctrine and maintains a largely planned economy is Cuba which describes itself as "a socialist state guided by ideas of Marx Engels and Lenin and in transition to a communist society". Cuba has adopted some market reforms but very little in comparison to China Vietnam and Laos and is still very heavily a planned economy. North Korea has even more of a planned economy than Cuba but follows Juche instead of Marxist-Leninism. Communist states which have adopted widespread market economic reforms People's Republic of China - Describes itself as "socialism with Chinese characteristics" Socialist Republic of Vietnam - Describes itself "in transition toward socialism in the light of Marxism-Leninism." Lao People's Democratic Republic - In addition Laos removed all references to Marxism-Leninism communism and socialism from its constitution in 1991. Communist states with no references to Marxist-Leninism but still possess a party-state overlap Democratic People's Republic of Korea - As mentioned above removed Marxist-Leninism references and officially follows Juche.27 Lao People's Democratic Republic - As mentioned above Laos no longer describes itself as a communist state since 1991. Democratic states with communist governments There are multi-party states that currently have communist parties in government. Such states are not considered to be communist states as the countries themselves allow for multiple parties and do not provide a constitutional role for their communist parties.  Cyprus (since February 2008); Progressive Party of Working People  Nepal (since April 2008); Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Moldova is perhaps the best example of a country where there is a large communist party that observes and operates within a democratic state. Moldova where the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova was the democratically elected govering party 1998 to 2009. After the July 2009 parliamentary election the Alliance For European Integration agreed to create a governing coalition. The Communist party with three times the support of the next largest party operates currently as a loyal opposition party. Communist parties as part of other ruling coalition In Cyprus the ruling Communist party did not come to power by formenting a successful revolution but rather by being elected to power and thus operate according to the norms of a multi-party system. In Nepal the ruling Communist parties participate in a multi-party coalition government an alliance of 22 parties that holds 350 seats in the 601-member constituent assembly. There are also some parties that participate as junior partners in ruling coalitions as listed below.  Brazil  Communist Party of Brazil  participates in the ruling coalition  South Africa  South African Communist Party  participates in the ruling coalition  Sri Lanka  Communist Party of Sri Lanka  participates in the ruling coalition  Syria  Syrian Communist Party (Bakdash) Syrian Communist Party (Faisal)  participates in the ruling coalition  Ukraine  Communist Party of Ukraine participates in the ruling coalition  Uruguay  Communist Party of Uruguay  participates in the ruling coalition See also List of socialist countries which includes a list of current and former communist states. List of communist parties Soviet Empire Criticisms of communist party rule References "The first defining feature of a Communist system is the monopoly of power of the Communist Party" : Archie Brown The Rise and Fall of communism Vintage Books 2009 page 105 a b Furtak Robert K. "The political systems of the socialist states" St. Martin's Press New York 1986 pp. 8-9. Furtak Robert K. "The political systems of the socialist states" St. Martin's Press New York 1986 p. 12. Furtak Robert K. "The political systems of the socialist states" St. Martin's Press New York 1987 p. 13. Furtak Robert K. "The political systems of the socialist states" St. Martin's Press New York 1986 p. 14. Furtak Robert K. "The political systems of the socialist states" St. Martin's Press New York 1986 p. 16-17. Furtak Robert K. "The political systems of the socialist states" St. Martin's Press New York 1986 p. 18-19. United Nations Human Rights Website - Treaty Bodies Database - Document - State Party Report - Germany Kinzer Stephen (15 January 1987). "NICARAGUA'S COMMUNIST PARTY SHIFTS TO OPPOSITION". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/01/15/world/nicaragua-s-communist-party-shifts-to-opposition.html.  "Country profile: Cyprus". BBC News. 3 March 2011. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/mobile/europe/countryprofiles/1016541.stm.  Kerala Assembly Elections-- 2006 a b c d e THE SO-CALLED 'SOCIALIST' COUNTRIES Tony Cliff: The Nature of Stalinist Russia The oft-cited quote is borrowed from a variation of the English translation of Anti-Dhring 1878 by Friedrich Engels Part III: Socialism - The proletariat seizes political power and turns the means of production in the first instance into state property. But in doing this it abolishes itself as proletariat abolishes all class distinctions and class antagonisms abolishes also the state as state. Society thus far based upon class antagonisms had need of the state that is of an organisation of the particular class which was pro tempore the exploiting class for the maintenance of its external conditions of production and therefore especially for the purpose of forcibly keeping the exploited classes in the condition of oppression corresponding with the given mode of production (slavery serfdom wage-labour). The state was the official representative of society as a whole; the gathering of it together into a visible embodiment. But it was this only in so far as it was the state of that class which itself represented for the time being society as a whole: in ancient times the state of slave-owning citizens; in the Middle Ages the feudal lords; in our own time the bourgeoisie. When at last it becomes the real representative of the whole of society it renders itself unnecessary. As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production with the collisions and excesses arising from these are removed nothing more remains to be repressed and a special repressive force a state is no longer necessary. The first act by virtue of which the state really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of societythe taking possession of the means of production in the name of societythis is at the same time its last independent act as a state. State interference in social relations becomes in one domain after another superfluous and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things and by the conduct of processes of production. The state is not "abolished". It dies out. Badiou Alain. The Communist Hypothesis transl. by David Macey and Steve Corcoran; (New York: Verso 2010 a b Leon Trotsky: The Revolution Betrayed Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1481 (2006) Need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian communist regimes The Economics of Soviet Agriculture by Leonard E. Hubbard p. 117-18 Kenez Peter (1985). The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of Mass Mobilization 1917-1929. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521313988.  STATE CAPITALISM International Communist Current Tony Cliff for example. See: Tony Cliff's Internet Archive CIA World Factbook: FIELD LISTING :: GOVERNMENT TYPE http://maoistrebelnews.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/bambook-capitalism-alesson-leared/ http://www.teachabroadchina.com/china-not-communist-country-ccp/ http://answers.yahoo.com/question/indexqid20090814004646AAL3yjq http://wiki.answers.com/Q/IsNorthKoreastillacommunistcountry Kim Jong-Il (31 March 1982). "On the Juche Idea". http://www1.korea-np.co.jp/pk/062ndissue/98092410.htm#4.%20THE%20GUIDING%20PRINCIPLES%20OF%20THE%20JUCHE%20IDEA. Retrieved 2007-01-03.  v d eSocialism by country  History and variants History Brazil  Canada  France  India  Great Britain  Netherlands  New Zealand  Pakistan  United States Variants African  Arab  Chinese  Labor Zionism  Melanesian  with Chinese characteristics  in One Country  Communist states Africa Angola  Benin  Congo  Ethiopia  Mozambique  Somalia Asia Afghanistan  Azerbaijan  PR China  Kampuchea (197579)  Kampuchea (19791993)  Laos  Mongolia  North Korea  North Vietnam  South Vietnam  South Yemen (19671990)  South Yemen (1994)  Tuva  Vietnam Europe Albania  Bulgaria  Czechoslovakia  East Germany  Finland  Hungary  Poland  Pridnestrovian Republic  Romania  Soviet Union  Yugoslavia Latin America Cuba  Grenada v d eAuthoritarian forms of government Autocratic Absolute monarchy  Despotism  Dictatorship  Enlightened absolutism  Tyranny Totalitarian Fascism  Nazism  Communist state  Theocracy Other Illiberal democracy (Inverted totalitarianism  Totalitarian democracy) Military dictatorship  Military junta  Oligarchy  Single-party state  Police state (Counterintelligence state)