This article is missing citations or needs footnotes. Please help add inline citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (October 2009) New Latin Latinitas nova Linnaeus's Systema Naturae is a famous New Latin text. Spoken in Europe Language extinction developed into contemporary Latin by the 20th century Language family Indo-European Italic Latino-Faliscan Latin New Latin Language codes ISO 639-1 la ISO 639-2 lat ISO 639-3 lat European countries with a Neo-Latin literary tradition Note: This page may contain IPA phonetic symbols in Unicode.

The term New Latin or Neo-Latin1 is used to describe the Latin language used in original works created between c. 1500 and c. 1900. Among other uses Latin during this period was employed in scholarly and scientific publications. Latin vocabulary words created during this period for the purpose of expressing scientific ideas form the basis for much modern scientific terminology such as technical terms in zoological and botanical description and taxonomy.

The language of original Latin works created since the beginning of the 20th century is treated in the article on contemporary Latin. Contents 1 Extent 2 History of New Latin 2.1 Beginnings 2.2 Height 2.3 Decline 2.4 Crisis and transformation 2.5 Relics 3 Pronunciation 4 Orthography 4.1 Characters 4.2 Diacritics 5 Notable works (1500-1900) 5.1 Literature and biography 5.2 Scientific works 5.3 Other technical subjects 6 Footnotes 7 See also 8 References 9 External links Extent

Classicists use the term "Neo-Latin" to describe the use of the Latin language for any purpose scientific or literary after the Renaissance. The beginning of the period is imprecise; however the spread of secular education the acceptance of humanistic literary norms and the wide availability of Latin texts following the invention of printing mark the transition to a new era at the end of the 15th century. The end of the New Latin period is likewise indeterminate but Latin as a regular vehicle of communicating ideas became rare after the first few decades of the 19th century and by 1900 it survived primarily in international scientific vocabulary cladistics and systematics. The term "New Latin" came into widespread use towards the end of the 1890s among linguists and scientists.

New Latin was at least in its early days an international language used throughout Catholic and Protestant Europe as well as in the colonies of the major European powers. This area included all of Western Europe including Scandinavia; its southern border was the Mediterranean Sea while in Eastern Europe it had little use in regions with majority Orthodox or Muslim populations with the division more or less corresponding to the modern eastern borders of Finland the Baltic states Poland Slovakia Hungary and Croatia. Russia's acquisition of Kiev in the later 17th century introduced the study of New Latin to Russia. History of New Latin Beginnings

New Latin was inaugurated by the triumph of the humanist reform of Latin education led by such writers as Erasmus More and Colet. Medieval Latin had been the practical working language of the Roman Catholic Church taught throughout Europe to aspiring clerics and refined in the medieval universities. It was a flexible and living language full of neologisms and often composed without reference to the grammar or style of classical (usually pre-Christian) authors. While accepting many of the strengths of Medieval Latin the humanist reformers sought both to purify Latin grammar and style and to make Latin applicable to concerns beyond the ecclesiastical creating a body of Latin literature outside the bounds of the Church. Attempts at reforming Latin use occurred sporadically throughout the period becoming most successful in the mid-to-late 19th century. Height Europe in 1648

The Protestant Reformation (15201580) though it removed Latin from the liturgies of the churches of Northern Europe may have advanced the cause of the new secular Latin. The period during and after the Reformation coinciding with the growth of printed literature saw the growth of an immense body of New Latin literature on all kinds of secular as well as religious subjects.

The heyday of New Latin was its first two centuries (15001700) when in the continuation of the Medieval Latin tradition it served as the primary language of science education and to some degree diplomacy in Europe. Classic works such as Newton's Principia Mathematica (1687) were written in the language. Throughout this period Latin was a universal school subject and indeed the pre-eminent subject for elementary education in Western Europe and places that shared its culture. All universities required Latin proficiency (obtained in local grammar schools) to obtain admittance as a student.

Through most of the 17th century Latin was also supreme as an international language of diplomatic correspondence used in negotiations between nations and the writing of treaties e.g. the peace treaties of Osnabrck and Mnster (1648). As an auxiliary language to the local vernaculars New Latin appeared in a wide variety of documents ecclesiastical legal diplomatic academic and scientific. While a text written in English French or Spanish at this time might be understood by a significant cross section of the learned only a Latin text could be certain of finding someone to interpret it anywhere between Lisbon and Helsinki.

As late as the 1720s Latin was still used conversationally and was serviceable as an international auxiliary language between people of different countries who had no other language in common. For instance the Hanoverian king George I of Great Britain (reigned 17141727) who had no command of spoken English communicated in Latin with his Prime Minister Robert Walpole2 who knew neither German nor French. Decline By about 1700 the growing movement for the use of national languages (already found earlier in literature and the Protestant religious movement) had reached academia and an example of the transition is Newton's writing career which began in New Latin and ended in English (e.g. Opticks 1704). A much earlier example is Galileo c. 1600 some of whose scientific writings were in Latin some in Italian the latter to reach a wider audience. By contrast while German philosopher Christian Wolff (16791754) popularized German as a language of scholarly instruction and research and wrote some works in German he continued to write primarily in Latin so that his works could more easily reach an international audience (e.g. Philosophia moralis 175053). Likewise in the early 18th century French replaced Latin as a diplomatic language due to the commanding presence in Europe of the France of Louis XIV. At the same time some (like King Frederick William I of Prussia) were dismissing Latin as a useless accomplishment unfit for a man of practical affairs. The last international treaty to be written in Latin was the Treaty of Vienna in 1738; after the War of the Austrian Succession (174048) international diplomacy was conducted predominantly in French. A diminishing audience combined with diminishing production of Latin texts pushed Latin into a declining spiral from which it has not recovered. As it was gradually abandoned by various fields and as less written material appeared in it there was less of a practical reason for anyone to bother to learn Latin; as fewer people knew Latin there was less reason for material to be written in the language. Latin came to be viewed as esoteric irrelevant and worst of all too difficult. As languages like French German and English became more widely known use of a 'difficult' auxiliary language seemed unnecessarywhile the argument that Latin could expand readership beyond a single nation was fatally weakened if in fact Latin readers did not compose a majority of the intended audience. As the 18th century progressed the extensive literature in Latin being produced at the beginning slowly contracted. By 1800 Latin publications were far outnumbered and often outclassed by writings in the vernacular. Latin literature lasted longest in very specific fields (e.g. botany and zology) where it had acquired a technical character and where a literature available only to a small number of learned individuals could remain viable. By the end of the 19th century Latin in some instances functioned less as a language than as a code capable of concise and exact expression as for instance in physicians' prescriptions or in a botanist's description of a specimen. In other fields (e.g. anatomy or law) where Latin had been widely used it survived in technical phrases and terminology. The perpetuation of Ecclesiastical Latin in the Roman Catholic Church through the 20th century can be considered a special case of the technicalizing of Latin and the narrowing of its use to an lite class of readers. By 1900 creative Latin composition for purely artistic purposes had become rare. Authors such as Arthur Rimbaud and Max Beerbohm wrote Latin verse but these texts were either school exercises or occasional pieces. The last survivals of New Latin to convey non-technical information appear in the use of Latin to cloak passages and expressions deemed too indecent (in the 19th century) to be read by children the lower classes or (most) women. Such passages appear in translations of foreign texts and in works on folklore anthropology and psychology e.g. Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis (1886). Crisis and transformation Latin as a language held a place of educational pre-eminence until the second half of the 19th century. At that point its value was increasingly questioned; in the 20th century educational philosophies such as that of John Dewey dismissed its relevance. At the same time the philological study of Latin appeared to show that the traditional methods and materials for teaching Latin were dangerously out of date and ineffective. In secular academic use however New Latin declined sharply and then continuously after about 1700. Although Latin texts continued to be written throughout the 18th and into the 19th century their number and their scope diminished over time. By 1900 very few new texts were being created in Latin for practical purposes and the production of Latin texts had become little more than a hobby for Latin enthusiasts. Around the beginning of the 19th century came a renewed emphasis on the study of Classical Latin as the spoken language of the Romans of the 1st centuries BC and AD. This new emphasis similar to that of the Humanists but based on broader linguistic historical and critical studies of Latin literature led to the exclusion of Neo-Latin literature from academic studies in schools and universities (except for advanced historical language studies); to the abandonment of New Latin neologisms; and to an increasing interest in the reconstructed Classical pronunciation which displaced the several regional pronunciations in Europe in the early 20th century. Coincident with these changes in Latin instruction and to some degree motivating them came a concern about lack of Latin proficiency among students. Latin had already lost its privileged role as the core subject of elementary instruction; and as education spread to the middle and lower classes it tended to be dropped altogether. By the mid-20th century even the trivial acquaintance with Latin typical of the 19th century student was a thing of the past. Relics This pocket watch made for the medical community has Latin instructions for measuring a patient's pulse rate on its dial: enumeras ad XX pulsus "count to the twentieth heartbeat". Ecclesiastical Latin the form of New Latin used in the Roman Catholic Church remained in use throughout the period and after. Until the Second Vatican Council of 1962-65 all priests were expected to have competency in it and it was studied in Catholic schools. It is today still the official language of the Church and all Catholic priests of the Latin liturgical rites are required by canon law to have competency in the language although most do not.3 Use of Latin in the Mass largely abandoned through the later 20th century has recently seen a resurgence due in large part to Pope Benedict XVI's motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. New Latin is also the source of the biological system of binomial nomenclature and classification of living organisms devised by Carolus Linnus although the rules of the ICZN allow the construction of names that deviate considerably from historical norms. See also classical compounds. Another continuation is the use of Latin names for the surface features of planets and planetary satellites (planetary nomenclature) originated in the mid-17th century for selenographic toponyms. New Latin has also contributed a vocabulary for specialized fields such as anatomy and law; some of these words have become part of the normal non-technical vocabulary of various European languages. Pronunciation Further information: Latin regional pronunciation See also: Traditional English pronunciation of Latin New Latin had no single pronunciation but a host of local variants or dialects all distinct both from each other and from the historical pronunciation of Latin at the time of the Roman Republic and Empire. As a rule the local pronunciation of Latin used sounds identical to those of the dominant local language; the result of a concurrently evolving pronunciation in the living languages and the corresponding spoken dialects of Latin. Despite this variation there are some common characteristics to nearly all of the dialects of New Latin for instance: The use of a sibilant fricative or affricate in place of a stop for the letters c and sometimes g when preceding a front vowel. The use of a sibilant fricative or affricate for the letter t when not in the onset of the first syllable and preceding unstressed i followed by a vowel. The use of a labiodental fricative for most instances of the letter v (or consonantal u) instead of the classical labiovelar approximant / w /. A tendency for medial s to be voiced to z especially between vowels. The merger of and with e and of y with i. The loss of the distinction between short and long vowels with such vowel distinctions as remain being dependent upon word-stress. The regional dialects of New Latin can be grouped into families according to the extent to which they share common traits of pronunciation. The major division is between Western and Eastern family of New Latin. The Western family includes most Romance-speaking regions (France Spain Portugal Italy) and the British Isles; the Eastern includes Scandinavia Central Europe and Eastern Europe. The Western family is characterized inter alia by having a front variant of the letter g before the vowels e i y and also pronouncing j in the same way (except in Italy). In the Eastern family j is always pronounced j and g had the same sound (usually ) in front of both front and back vowels; exceptions developed later in some Scandinavian countries. The following table illustrates some of the variation of New Latin consonants found in various countries of Western Europe compared to the Classical Latin pronunciation of the 1st centuries BCE-CE.4 In Eastern Europe the pronunciation of Latin was generally similar to that used in Germany but usually with z for z instead of German ts . Roman letter Pronunciation Classical Western Central Eastern France England Portugal Spain Italy Romania Germany Netherlands Scandinavia c before "" "e" "i" "" y / k / / s / / s / / s / / / / t / / t / / ts / / s / / s / cc before "" "e" "i" "" "y" / kk / / ks / / ks / / ss / / k / / tt / / kt / / kts / / ss / / ss / ch / k / / k / / k / / k / / k / / k / / k / / h / / k / / x / / x / / k / g before "" "e" i" "" "y" / / / / / d / / / / x / / d / / d / / / / / or / x / / j/ j / j / / j / / j / / j / / j / qu before "a" "o" "u" / k / / k / / kw / / kw / / kw / / kw / / kv / / kv / / kv / / kv / qu before "" "e" "i" / k / / k / sc before "" "e" "i" "" "y" / sk / / s / / s / / s / / s / / / / st / / sk / (earlier / t /) / sts / / s / / s / t before unstressed i+vowel except initially or after "s" "t" "x" /t/ / / / / / ts/ /ts/ /ts/ /ts/ / ts / v / w / / v / / v / / v / / b / () / v / / v / / v / / v / / v / z / dz / / z / / z / / z / / / / dz / / z / / ts / / z / / s / Orthography New Latin texts are primarily found in early printed editions which present certain features of spelling and the use of diacritics distinct from the Latin of antiquity medieval Latin manuscript conventions and representations of Latin in modern printed editions. Characters In spelling New Latin in all but the earliest texts distinguishes the letter u from v and i from j. In older texts printed down to c. 1630 v was used in initial position (even when it represented a vowel e.g. in vt later printed ut) and u was used elsewhere e.g. in nouus later printed novus. By the mid-17th century the letter v was commonly used for the consonantal sound of Roman V which in most pronunciations of Latin in the New Latin period was v (and not w) as in vulnus "wound" corvus "crow". Where the pronunciation remained w as after g q and s the spelling u continued to be used for the consonant e.g. in lingua qualis and suadeo. The letter j generally represented a consonantal sound (pronounced in various ways in different European countries e.g. j d x). It appeared for instance in jam "now" or jubet "orders" (now spelled iam and iubet). It was also found between vowels in the words ejus hujus cujus (now normally spelled eius huius cuius) and pronounced as a consonant; likewise in such forms as major and pejor. J was also used when the last in a sequence of two or more i's e.g. radij (now spelled radii) "rays" alijs "to others" iij the Roman numeral 3; however ij was for the most part replaced by ii by 1700. In common with texts in other languages using the Roman alphabet Latin texts down to c. 1800 used the letter-form (the long s) for s in positions other than at the end of a word; e.g. ipiimus. The digraphs ae and oe were rarely so written (except when part of a word in all capitals e.g. in titles chapter headings or captions) ; instead the ligatures and were used e.g. Csar pna. More rarely (and usually in 16th to early 17th century texts) the e caudata is found substituting for either. Diacritics Three kinds of diacritic were in common use: the acute accent the grave accent and the circumflex accent . These were normally only marked on vowels (e.g. ); but see below regarding que. Handwriting in Latin from 1595 The acute accent marked a stressed syllable but was usually confined to those where the stress was not in its normal position as determined by vowel length and syllabic weight. In practice it was typically found on the vowel in the syllable immediately preceding a final clitic particularly que "and" ve "or" and ne a question marker; e.g. idmque "and the same (thing)". By some printers however this acute accent was placed over the q in que when that clitic followed e.g. eorumque "and their". The acute accent fell out of favor by the 19th century. The grave accent had various uses none related to pronunciation or stress. It was always found on the preposition (variant of ab "by" or "from") and likewise on the preposition (variant of ex "from" or "out of"). It might also be found on the interjection "O". Most frequently it was found on the last (or only) syllable of various adverbs and conjunctions particularly those that might be confused with prepositions or with inflected forms of nouns verbs or adjectives. Examples include cert "certainly" ver "but" primm "at first" pst "afterwards" cm "when" ade "so far so much" un "together" qum "than". In some texts the grave was found over the clitics such as que in which case the acute accent did not appear before them. The circumflex accent represented metrical length (generally not distinctively pronounced in the New Latin period) and was chiefly found over an a when that represented an ablative singular case e.g. edem form "with the same shape". It might also be used to distinguish two words otherwise spelled identically but distinct in vowel length; e.g. hc "here" differentiated from hic "this" fugre "they have fled" (fgrunt) distinguished from fugere "to flee" or senats "of the senate" distinct from senatus "the senate". It might also be used for vowels arising from contraction e.g. nsti for novisti "you know" impersse for imperavisse "to have commanded" or d for dei or dii. Notable works (1500-1900) Erasmus by Holbein Literature and biography 1511. Stultiti Laus essay by Desiderius Erasmus. 1516. Utopia1 2 by Thomas More 1525.&1538. Hispaniola and Emerita two comedies by Juan Maldonado. 1546. Sintra a poem by Luisa Sigea de Velasco. 1602. Cenodoxus a play by Jacob Bidermann. 1608. Parthenica two books of poetry by Elizabeth Jane Weston. 1621. Argenis a novel by John Barclay. 1626-1652. Poems by John Milton. 1634. Somnium a scientific fantasy by Johannes Kepler. 1741. Nicolai Klimii Iter Subterraneum34 a satire by Ludvig Holberg. 1761. Slawkenbergii Fabella short parodic piece in Laurence Sterne's Tristram Shandy. 1767. Apollo et Hyacinthus intermezzo by Rufinus Widl (with music by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart). 1835. Georgii Washingtonii Americ Septentrionalis Civitatum Fderatarum Prsidis Primi Vita biography of George Washington by Francis Glass. Scientific works 1543. De Revolutionibus Orbium Clestium by Nicolaus Copernicus 1545. Ars Magna by Hieronymus Cardanus 1551-58 and 1587. Historiae animalium by Conrad Gessner. 1600. De Magnete Magneticisque Corporibus et de Magno Magnete Tellure by William Gilbert. 1609. Astronomia nova by Johannes Kepler. 1610. Sidereus Nuncius by Galileo Galilei. 1620. Novum Organum by Francis Bacon.5 1628. Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus by William Harvey. 6 1659. Systema Saturnium by Christiaan Huygens. 1673. Horologium Oscillatorium by Christiaan Huygens. Also at Gallica. 1687. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton. 7 1703. Hortus Malabaricus by Hendrik van Rheede.89 1735. Systema Naturae by Carolus Linnaeus. 1737. Mechanica sive motus scientia analytice exposita by Leonhard Euler. 1738. Hydrodynamica sive de viribus et motibus fluidorum commentarii by Daniel Bernoulli. 1748. Introductio in analysin infinitorum by Leonhard Euler. 1753. Species Plantarum by Carolus Linnaeus. 1758. Systema Naturae (10th ed.) by Carolus Linnaeus. 1801. Disquisitiones Arithmeticae by Carl Gauss. 1810. Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen by Robert Brown.10 1840. Flora Brasiliensis by Carl Friedrich Philipp von Martius.11 1864. Philosophia zoologica by Jan van der Hoeven. Other technical subjects 1511-16. De Orbe Novo Decades by Peter Martyr d'Anghiera. 1514. De Asse et Partibus by Guillaume Bud. 1524. De motu Hispani by Juan Maldonado. 1525. De subventione pauperum sive de humanis necessitatibus libri duo by Juan Luis Vives. 1530. Syphilis sive De Morbo Gallico by Girolamo Fracastoro(transcription) 1531. De disciplinis libri XX by Juan Luis Vives. 1552. Colloquium de aulica et privata vivendi ratione by Luisa Sigea de Velasco. 1553. Christianismi Restitutio by Michael Servetus. A mainly theological treatise where the function of pulmonary circulation was first described by a European more than half a century before Harvey. For the non-trinitarian message of this book Servetus was denounced by Calvin and his followers condemned by the French Inquisition and burnt alive just outside of Geneva. Only three copies survived. 1554. De natur philosophia seu de Platonis et Aristotelis consensione libri quinque by Sebastin Fox Morcillo. 1582. Rerum Scoticarum Historia by George Buchanan (transcription) 1587. Minerva sive de causis lingu Latin by Francisco Snchez de las Brozas. 1589. De natura Novi Orbis libri duo et de promulgatione euangelii apud barbaros sive de procuranda Indorum salute by Jos de Acosta. 1597. Disputationes metaphysic by Francisco Surez. 1599. De rege et regis institutione by Juan de Mariana. 1604-1608. Historia sui temporis by Jacobus Augustus Thuanus. 1612. De legibus by Francisco Surez. 1615. De Christiana expeditione apud Sinas by Matteo Ricci and Nicolas Trigault. 1625. De Jure Belli ac Pacis by Hugo Grotius. (Posner Collection facsimile; Gallica facsimile) 1641. Meditationes de prima philosophia by Ren Descartes. (The Latin French and English by John Veitch.) 1642-1658. Elementa Philosophica by Thomas Hobbes. 1652-1654. dipus gyptiacus by Athanasius Kircher. 1655. Novus Atlas Sinensis by Martino Martini. 1656. Flora Sinensis by Michael Boym. 1657. Orbis Sensualium Pictus by John Amos Comenius. (Hoole parallel Latin/English translation 1777; Online version in Latin) 1670. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Baruch Spinoza. 1725. Gradus ad Parnassum by Johann Joseph Fux. An influential treatise on musical counterpoint. 1780. De rebus gestis Caroli V Imperatoris et Regis Hispani and De rebus Hispanorum gestis ad Novum Orbem Mexicumque by Juan Gins de Seplveda. Footnotes "Neo-Latin". The American College Dictionary. Random House. 1966.  "Before I conclude the reign of George the First one remarkable fact must not be omitted: As the king could not readily speak English nor Sir Robert Walpole French the minister was obliged to deliver his sentiments in Latin; and as neither could converse in that language with readiness and propriety Walpole was frequently heard to say that during the reign of the first George he governed the kingdom by means of bad latin." Coxe William (1800). Memoirs of the Life and Administration of Sir Robert Walpole Earl of Orford. London: Cadell and Davies. p. 465. http://books.google.com/booksidrVu2kU9VQJwC&pgPA465. Retrieved June 2 2010.  "It was perhaps still more remarkable and an instance unparalleled that Sir Robert governed George the First in Latin the King not speaking English and his minister no German nor even French. It was much talked of that Sir Robert detecting one of the Hanoverian ministers in some trick or falsehood before the King's face had the firmness to say to the German "Mentiris impudissime!"Walpole Horace (1842). The Letters of Horace Walpole Earl of Orford. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard. p. 70. http://books.google.com/booksidXIkAAAAMAAJ&pgPA70. Retrieved June 2 2010.  This requirement is found under canon 249 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law. See "1983 Code of Canon Law". Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 1983. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/PW.HTM. Retrieved 22 March 2011.  Fisher Michael Montgomery (1879). The Three Pronunciations of Latin. Boston: New England Publishing Company. pp. 1011. http://books.google.com/booksid-CkTAAAAYAAJ.  See also Binomial nomenclature Classical compound References IJsewijn Jozef with Dirk Sacr. Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. 2 vols. Leuven University Press 1990-1998. Waquet Franoise Latin or the Empire of a Sign: From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries (Verso 2003) ISBN 1-85984-402-2; translated from the French by John Howe. External links Look up new latin in Wiktionary the free dictionary. An Analytic Bibliography of On-line Neo-Latin Titles Bibliography of Renaissance Latin and Neo-Latin literature on the web. A Lost Continent of Literature: The rise and fall of Neo-Latin the universal language of the Renaissance. An essay on Neo-Latin literature by James Hankins from the I Tatti Renaissance Library website. American Association for Neo-Latin Studies Latin Abbreviations used in modern language. CAMENA Latin Texts of Early Modern Europe Center for Neo-Latin Studies at University College Cork Database of Nordic Neo-Latin Literature Heinsius collection: Dutch Neo-Latin poetry Glossary of Latin Roots of Botanical Terms International Association for Neo-Latin Studies Latinitas Nova at Bibliotheca Augustana Hofmanni Joh. Jac. (2009) 1698 (in German Latin). Lexicon Universale. Corpus Automatum Multiplex Electorum Neolatinitatis Auctorum (CAMENA) University of Mannheim. http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/hofmann.html.  "Neo-Latin" (in Latin). The Latin Library. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/neo.html. Retrieved 12 October 2009.  Patzdasch Bernd (2008). "PANTOIA: Unterhaltsame Literatur und Dichtung in lateinischer und griechischer bersetzung" (in German). Pantoia. http://www.pantoia.de/pantoia.html. Retrieved 12 October 2009.  "Seminarium Philologiae Humanisticae". Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. 2009. http://www.arts.kuleuven.be/sph/. Retrieved 12 October 2009.  "Society for Neo-Latin Studies". University of Warwick UK. 2008. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/ren/snls/. Retrieved 12 October 2009.  v d eAges of Latin until 75 BC 75 BC 200 200900 9001300 13001500 1500present 1900present Old Latin Classical Latin Late Latin Medieval Latin Renaissance Latin New Latin Contemporary Latin See also: History of Latin Latin literature Vulgar Latin Ecclesiastical Latin Romance languages Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum Hiberno-Latin Judeo-Latin