Usefulness
Related
EpicurusDavid_Hume
Peter_Singer
Hedonism
Pain
Suffering
Pleasure
Happiness
Eudaimonia
Game_theory
Social_choice
Economics
John_Rawls
Edgeworth_box
Webs | Wiki | Videos | Images | Posts | Auctions | Books | News | MindMap about Usefulness
In economics, utility is a measure of the relative satisfaction from, or desirability of, consumption of various goods and services. Given this measure, one may speak meaningfully of increasing or decreasing utility, and thereby explain economic behavior in terms of attempts to increase one's utility.
The doctrine of utilitarianism saw the maximization of utility as a moral criterion for the organization of society. According to utilitarians, such as Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1876), society should aim to maximize the total utility of individuals, aiming for "the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people". Another theory forwarded by John Rawls (1921-2002) would have society maximize the utility of the individual initially receiving the minimum amount of utility.
Utility is usually applied by economists in such constructs as the indifference curve, which plot the combination of commodities that an individual or a society would accept to maintain a given level of satisfaction. Individual utility and social utility can be construed as the dependent variable of a utility function (such as an indifference curve map) and a social welfare function respectively. When coupled with production or commodity constraints, under some assumptions, these functions can represent Pareto efficiency, such as illustrated by Edgeworth boxes in contract curves. Such efficiency is a central concept in welfare economics.
Contents 1 Quantifying utility 2 Cardinal and ordinal utility 3 Expected utility 3.1 Additive von Neumann–Morgenstern utility 4 Money 5 Discussion and criticism 6 References and additional reading 7 External links // Quantifying utilityIt was recognized that utility could not be measured or observed directly, so instead economists devised a way to measure actual behavior and assume that, in a perfectly competitive equilibrium, this behavior reveals the underlying relative utilities. These 'revealed preferences', as they were named by Paul Samuelson, were revealed in price:
Utility is taken to be correlative to Desire or Want. It has been already argued that desires cannot be measured directly, but only indirectly, by the outward phenomena to which they give rise: and that in those cases with which economics is chiefly concerned the measure is found in the price which a person is willing to pay for the fulfilment or satisfaction of his desire. (Marshall 1920:78)1
Cardinal and ordinal utilityEconomists distinguish between cardinal utility and ordinal utility. When cardinal utility is used, the magnitude of utility differences is treated as an ethically or behaviorally significant quantity. On the other hand, ordinal utility captures only ranking and not strength of preferences.
Utility functions of both sorts assign a ranking to members of a choice set. For example, suppose a cup of orange juice has utility of 120 utils, a cup of tea has a utility of 80 utils, and a cup of water has a utility of 40 utils. When speaking of cardinal utility, it could be concluded that the cup of orange juice is better than the cup of tea by exactly the same amount by which the cup of tea is better than the cup of water. One is not entitled to conclude, however, that the cup of tea is two thirds as good as the cup of juice, because this conclusion would depend not only on magnitudes of utility differences, but also on the "zero" of utility.
It is tempting when dealing with cardinal utility to aggregate utilities across persons. The argument against this is that interpersonal comparisons of utility are suspect because there is no good way to interpret how different people value consumption bundles.
When ordinal utilities are used, differences in utils are treated as ethically or behaviorally meaningless: the utility values assigned encode a full behavioral ordering between members of a choice set, but nothing about strength of preferences. In the above example, it would only be possible to say that juice is preferred to tea to water, but no more.
Neoclassical economics has largely retreated from using cardinal utility functions as the basic objects of economic analysis, in favor of considering agent preferences over choice sets. As will be seen in subsequent sections, however, preference relations can often be represented by utility functions satisfying a variety of useful properties.
Ordinal utility functions are equivalent up to positive monotone transformations, while cardinal utilities are equivalent up to positive linear transformations.
While preferences are the conventional foundation of microeconomics, it is often convenient to represent preferences with a utility function and analyze human behavior indirectly with utility functions. Let X be the consumption set, the set of all mutually-exclusive packages the consumer could conceivably consume (such as an indifference curve map without the indifference curves). The consumer's utility function ranks each package in the consumption set. If u(x) ≥ u(y), then the consumer strictly prefers x to y or is indifferent between them.
For example, suppose a consumer's consumption set is X = {nothing, 1 apple, 1 orange, 1 apple and 1 orange, 2 apples, 2 oranges}, and its utility function is u(nothing) = 0, u (1 apple) = 1, u (1 orange) = 2, u (1 apple and 1 orange) = 4, u (2 apples) = 2 and u (2 oranges) = 3. Then this consumer prefers 1 orange to 1 apple, but prefers one of each to 2 oranges.
In microeconomic models, there are usually a finite set of L commodities, and a consumer may consume an arbitrary amount of each commodity. This gives a consumption set of , and each package is a vector containing the amounts of each commodity. In the previous example, we might say there are two commodities: apples and oranges. If we say apples is the first commodity, and oranges the second, then the consumption set X = and u (0, 0) = 0, u (1, 0) = 1, u (0, 1) = 2, u (1, 1) = 4, u (2, 0) = 2, u (0, 2) = 3 as before. Note that for u to be a utility function on X, it must be defined for every package in X.
A utility function rationalizes a preference relation on X if for every , if and only if . If u rationalizes , then this implies is complete and transitive, and hence rational.
In order to simplify calculations, various assumptions have been made of utility functions.
CES (constant elasticity of substitution, or isoelastic) utility Exponential utility Quasilinear utility Homothetic utilityMost utility functions used in modeling or theory are well-behaved. They are usually monotonic, quasi-concave, continuous and globally non-satiated. However, it is possible for preferences not to be representable by a utility function. An example is lexicographic preferences which are not continuous and cannot be represented by a continuous utility function.2
Expected utility Main article: Expected utility hypothesisThe expected utility theory deals with the analysis of choices among risky projects with (possibly multidimensional) outcomes.
The expected utility model was first proposed by Nicholas Bernoulli in 1713 and solved by Daniel Bernoulli in 1738 as the St. Petersburg paradox. Bernoulli argued that the paradox could be resolved if decisionmakers displayed risk aversion and argued for a logarithmic cardinal utility function.
The first important use of the expected utility theory was that of John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern who used the assumption of expected utility maximization in their formulation of game theory.
Additive von Neumann–Morgenstern utility This section needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Economics or the Economics Portal may be able to help recruit an expert. (February 2010)In older definitions of utility, it makes sense to rank utilities, but not to add them together. A person can say that a new shirt is preferable to a baloney sandwich, but not that it is twenty times preferable to the sandwich.
The reason is that the utility of twenty sandwiches is not twenty times the utility of one sandwich, by the law of diminishing returns. So it is hard to compare the utility of the shirt with 'twenty times the utility of the sandwich'. But Von Neumann and Morgenstern suggested an unambiguous way of making a comparison like this.
Their method of comparison involves considering probabilities. If a person can choose between various randomized events (lotteries), then it is possible to additively compare the shirt and the sandwich. It is possible to compare a sandwich with probability 1, to a shirt with probability p or nothing with probability 1-p. By adjusting p, the point at which the sandwich becomes preferable defines the ratio of the utilities of the two options.
A notation for a lottery is as follows: if options A and B have probability p and 1 − p in the lottery, write it as a linear combination:
More generally, for a lottery with many possible options:
,with the sum of the pis equalling 1.
By making some reasonable assumptions about the way choices behave, von Neumann and Morgenstern showed that if an agent can choose between the lotteries, then this agent has a utility function which can be added and multiplied by real numbers, which means the utility of an arbitrary lottery can be calculated as a linear combination of the utility of its parts.
This is called the expected utility theorem. The required assumptions are four axioms about the properties of the agent's preference relation over 'simple lotteries', which are lotteries with just two options. Writing to mean 'A is preferred to B', the axioms are:
completeness: For any two simple lotteries and , either , , or . transitivity: if and , then . convexity/continuity (Archimedean property): If , then there is a between 0 and 1 such that the lottery is equally preferable to . independence: if , then .In more formal language: A von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function is a function from choices to the real numbers:
which assigns a real number to every outcome in a way that captures the agent's preferences over both simple and compound lotteries. The agent will prefer a lottery L2 to a lottery L1 if and only if the expected utility of L2 is greater than the expected utility of L1:
Repeating in category language: u is a morphism between the category of preferences with uncertainty and the category of reals as an additive group.
Of all the axioms, independence is the most often discarded. A variety of generalized expected utility theories have arisen, most of which drop or relax the independence axiom.
CES (constant elasticity of substitution, or isoelastic) utility is one with constant relative risk aversion Exponential utility exhibits constant absolute risk aversion MoneyOne of the most common uses of a utility function, especially in economics, is the utility of money. The utility function for money is a nonlinear function that is bounded and asymmetric about the origin. These properties can be derived from reasonable assumptions that are generally accepted by economists and decision theorists, especially proponents of rational choice theory. The utility function is concave in the positive region, reflecting the phenomenon of diminishing marginal utility. The boundedness reflects the fact that beyond a certain point money ceases being useful at all, as the size of any economy at any point in time is itself bounded. The asymmetry about the origin reflects the fact that gaining and losing money can have radically different implications both for individuals and businesses. The nonlinearity of the utility function for money has profound implications in decision making processes: in situations where outcomes of choices influence utility through gains or losses of money, which are the norm in most business settings, the optimal choice for a given decision depends on the possible outcomes of all other decisions in the same time-period.3
Discussion and criticismCambridge economist Joan Robinson famously criticized utility of being a circular concept: "Utility is the quality in commodities that makes individuals want to buy them, and the fact that individuals want to buy commodities shows that they have utility" (Robinson 1962: 48)4
Different value systems have different perspectives on the use of utility in making moral judgments. For example, Marxists, Kantians, and certain libertarians (such as Nozick) all believe utility to be irrelevant as a moral or at least not as important as other factors such as natural rights, law, conscience and/or religious doctrine. It is debatable whether any of these can be adequately represented in a system that uses a utility model.
Another criticism comes from the assertion that neither cardinal nor ordinary utility are empirically observable in the real world. In case of cardinal utility it is impossible to measure the level of satisfaction "quantitatively" when someone consumes/purchases an apple. In case of ordinal utility, it is impossible to determine what choices were made when someone purchases, for example, an orange. Any act would involve preference over infinite possibility of a set choices such as (apple, orange juice, other vegetable, vitamin C tablets, exercise, not purchasing, etc). [1][2][3]
References and additional reading ^ Alfred Marshall. 1920. Principles of Economics. An introductory Volume. 8th edition. London: Macmillan. ^ Jonathan E. Ingersoll, Jr. Theory of Financial Decision Making. Rowman and Littlefield, 1987. p. 21 ^ J.O. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer-Verlag 2nd ed. (1985) ch. 2. (ISBN 3540960988) ^ Joan Robinson, 1962. Economic Philosophy. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books Ltd. Neumann, John von and Morgenstern, Oskar Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press. 1944 sec.ed. 1947 Nash Jr., John F. The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18:155 1950 Anand, Paul. Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk Oxford, Oxford University Press. 1993 reprinted 1995, 2002 Kreps, David M. Notes on the Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO. Westview Press. 1988 Fishburn, Peter C. Utility Theory for Decision Making. Huntington, NY. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co. 1970. ISBN 978-0471260608 Plous, S. The Psychology of Judgement and Decision Making New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993 External links Anatomy of Cobb-Douglas Type Utility Functions in 3D Anatomy of CES Type Utility Functions in 3D Simpler Definition with example from InvestopediaDefinition of usefulness from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary with audio pronunciations, thesaurus, Word of the Day, and word games.
www.merriam-webster.com/
Kobe, Mar 16, 2010 - (JCN Newswire) - Sysmex Corporation (TSE: 6869) has started research jointly with the National Cancer Center Hospital to verify clinical usefulness of a technology developed by Sysmex for detecting living tumor cells suspended in blood (CTC detection technology).
FIGURE 1 Usefulness to Company of the ATP Proposal Process Most applicants view the ATP proposal process as fair
YELLOW. . . + CONTEST
rags WALKS OF USEFULNESS OR REMINISCENES OF MRS. PRIOR
Only $5.99
An Enquiry into an Origin of Honour and the Usefulness of Christianity in War BiblioLife
Translations of usefulness. usefulness synonyms, usefulness antonyms. Information about usefulness in the free online English dictionary and ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/
Flossmoor Mayor Paul Braun, who campaigned for office last year on making the village more green-conscious, is proposing that the village look into forming an environmental commission. The village board agreed Monday night to put together a study group to research the usefulness of such a commission, which would assist the village in securing grants for green projects and increasing residents ...
Get Rich Slowly video contest
NEW The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning: Explain...
Only $180.0
Golden Steps to Respectability, Usefulness, and Happiness General Books LLC
usefulness. Plural. uncountable. usefulness (uncountable) the quality of being useful, to ... The usefulness of his latest reorganisation has been disputed. ...
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/
Apple CEO Steve Jobs emphasized the iPad’s capabilities as an e-book reader when he unveiled the device in late January, but its usefulness for carrying around electronic textbooks remains debatable, according to analysts interviewed by Computerworld.
EVE Online Tutorial: Changing the Overview
The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and
Only $11.95
Preparing for Usefulness English 8 (Rod and Staff) (Building Christian English Series)
Synonyms of usefulness from the Merriam-Webster Online Thesaurus with antonyms, definitions, Word of the Day, and word games.
www.merriam-webster.com/
WITH Parliament's busiest season of the year over, MPs are taking stock of the marathon Budget debate they sat through over the past two weeks. Whether a bright-eyed first-termer or a long-time backbencher, they were quick to suggest ways to improve the usefulness of the annual session.
utilisateurs nous avons utilisé le questionnaire d usefulness and ease of use développé par Todd Zazenlenchuck dans son application Datalogger Nous obtenons les résultats suivants Aisance d utilisation et utilité perçue résultats généraux
314MMX.mov
NEW An Essay on the Usefulness of Mathematical Learn...
Only $10.18
The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity The MIT Press
Find Synonym of usefulness and Antonym of usefulness at Thesaurus.com, Synonym, Synonyms, Thesaurus, Synonym Dictionary, Synonyms Dictionary, Antonym, ...
thesaurus.reference.com/
Flexibility in design and a more modular approach could extend the life--and usefulness--of data centers.
included a question about the most useful section of the tutorial in an effort to gather some feedback on what our users expect from our tutorials and what type of tutorial is the best fit Part 1 covered the basics on what a query string was and the basic structure of it including the basic way it is used with a survey Part 2 gave specific step by step instructions on
Rework by Jason Fried at SXSW, Usefulness
NEW The Social Construction of Usefulness - Abdelnou...
Only $85.21
The useless-/usefulness of argumentation: the DAO of disputation.: An article from: Argumentation and Advocacy American Forensic Association
Usefulness = (Functionality x Availability) – Burden. An example: A grandfather clock has the same function as a wrist watch - it tells the time, ...
www.usefulnessformula.com/
The FCC gets the national broadband plan largely right, pushing private-sector competition while helping hard-to-reach populations.
Most find blogs useful to spot emerging stories and as a general source of story ideas I asked the question In what way do you find blogs useful and provided a range of options to select On the right is a chart showing all the selections click to enlarge Top choices
Aspy Advice on paranoia and attachments.avi
NEW A Mighty Means of Usefulness: A Plea for Interce...
Only $22.95
The Selected Papers of Jane Addams: Vol. 2: Venturing into Usefulness (Selected Papers of Jane Adams) University of Illinois Press
Politics I conceive to be nothing more than the science of the ordered progress of society along the lines of greatest usefulness and convenience to itself. ...
www.brainyquote.com/words/us/
Cancer research has cost the U.S. government $100 billion since 1971 and the price of care, accounting for inflation, has more than doubled to $90 billion since 1990, according to six journal reports that raise key questions about the past and future success of the U.S. “
::shiamadrasa - Online Shia Madrasa
NEW A Mighty Means of Usefulness: A Plea for Interce...
Only $13.37
The Craftsman and the Critic: Defining Usefulness and Beauty in Arts and Crafts-era Boston Univ. of Massachusetts Press
usefulness noun The quality of being suitable or adaptable to an end: account , advantage , avail , benefit , profit , use , utility
www.answers.com/topic/
The death rate from all cancers fell by almost 16 percent from 1991 to 2006, the editorial said. Much of that decline came from anti-smoking campaigns and early disease detection, said the commentary by researchers at the American Cancer Society in Atlanta.
Survey results In November 2007 we surveyed 80 users of the Practical Answers website The results are shown below How useful was the information on the Practical Answers website We plan to offer more videos greater interactivity and tools to help develop a strong community amongst the development workers using Practical Answers How easy was it to find the
Operation Aphrodite "Weary Willy"
Potential Usefulness
Only $25.0
Preparing for Usefulness, English 8 Tests (Building Christian English Series) Rod and Staff Publishers, Inc
Usefulness of Uselessness. We are part of Western society, which through the process of several millennia has tended to be very rationalistic and activistic. ...
www.christinyou.net/pages/
The rising cost of cancer research and care, which helped reduce death rates by 16 percent over 40 years, is straining the U.S. health system and needs to be restrained, commentators said in a special edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
putting the greatest emphasis on blogs Blogs are a great place to start but it s also important to establish yourself in emerging forms of social media marketing before your competitors do Also of note it s interesting to see that MySpace finished dead last in this ranking It s well documented that MySpace has a less than stellar reputation for businesses but to see it
Homemade rocket fuel--too successful!
NEW The Higher Usefulness of Science, and Other Essa...
Only $16.01
A Passionate Usefulness: The Life and Literary Labors of Hannah Adams University of Virginia Press
What is usefulness? Meaning of usefulness as a legal term. What does usefulness mean in law? ... Usefulness of Training Topics for Domestic Violence Questionnaire ...
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/
David Beckham's Achilles injury is a setback too far in an era when pace is key, writes Henry Winter.
Ergonomic Ease of Learning Usefulness
Exodus - Iconoclasm, WOA'08
NEW Notes on the Usefulness of British Birds - Illse...
Only $11.66